PDA

View Full Version : What's your crazy and whacky theory?!


DarkWizard_PitchBlackX
04-17-2007, 08:34 PM
Do you have some super-far out idea that makes sense and you think should be investigated? No? Oh, too bad. I thought there were others. So, Just post your scientific theory.

Iconoclast
04-17-2007, 09:13 PM
Idk. Well, here it goes.

x/0 should be infinite, not 'undefined'. Lazyasses.

I mean, just graph a line with that slope, x/0; x > 0. It's infinite slope! Plus, say 1/0? How many times does it take you to divide a sheet of paper into 0 pieces?

Kameo
04-17-2007, 09:30 PM
There is no 0 pieces, 0 is nothing :p ....

romsRgood
04-18-2007, 08:05 AM
impossible is nothing.. only in selling nike products. :P

DukeNukem!!!
04-18-2007, 09:23 PM
Well I think Geometry Suckz and Algebra Rocks but tell my report that.

Kurt
04-18-2007, 09:30 PM
Well I think Geometry Suckz and Algebra Rocks but tell my report that.
I have the crazy and wacky theory that you are from Marz.

Carlrt
04-19-2007, 08:46 AM
my scientific theory is as follows

''Same **** Diffrent Day''

papuccino1
04-19-2007, 10:57 AM
Ok, heres my theory.

It's serious stuff. Might rock your world.


I'm going to assume most of you have a high-school degree and understand basic physics/chemistry.

We all know that the atom is made of a nucleos (proton+neutron) and electrons running around it. What's in between those massive spaces (relatively speaking)? NOTHING.

Now picture that all over your body. You are basically material made from nothing from empty space, with the ocasional proton and electron (once again, relatively speaking).

Place you're hand against the table. You can't burst through it can you. It's to hard. It is cedited to the repulsion of the electrons in your hand and the electrons in the table.

Here's where my theory comes in: If you hit it hard enough to break the table, are you changing the concentration of electrons in your hand? Is this proof that the soul exists and that you are essentially moving "charges" at free will? Maybe this prooves the existance of chi. (Not a-lá DragonBall Z hehe)

Well that's my theory let me know what you think.

Carlrt
04-19-2007, 11:35 AM
Ok, heres my theory.

It's serious stuff. Might rock your world.


I'm going to assume most of you have a high-school degree and understand basic physics/chemistry.



this would be a wrong asumption:nono:

most people on here are retards, i do however agree with the whole chi thing!

Iconoclast
04-19-2007, 07:42 PM
Exactly, Kameo; how many times does it take to rip a sheet of paper in half repeatedly until it is inexistent? Since atoms cannot be created or destroyed, may as well be infinite. It's like trying to divide a positive nonzero number by 2 repeatedly until you get 0; you'll never get there.also, like we learned in 3rd grade, dividing 5 by 3 equals 1 R2 (remainder 2). it's the same concept withi dividing by zero, except the whole number is the remainder. something divided by 0 should just be 0I learned that in Third Grade, too...and math is probably the only thing I paid attention to when I was that young, as every other subject depressed me. Instead of saying 10 / 3 = 3.3..., you say 3 r1. Basically, the remainder method is used to change it into a fraction later, 3 and r/3; r = 1.

Also, x/0 should not equal 0, for two reasons:
Graph the linear equation y = 0x in a coordinate plane. It's pretty much just a horizontal line, and if you know what something called slope is, essentially "rise over run," you know that a horizontal line has a slope of 0 (m = 0) and a vertical line has a slope of what I believe to be infinite (m = x/0; x > 0).
x/y can be written as a fraction. 3/5 could be written as either 0.6 or the fraction itself. But x/0? Say x is 1. Are you sure 1 out of 0 pieces of something is still considered 0 in amount and quantity?

Iconoclast
04-26-2007, 08:08 PM
To the article chaos master reported:

"Who'd have thought a fraction could cause so much controversy.

To sarah, zero out of zero 'things' may be considered 0 in quantity, when thinking geometrically, but in some nonphysical demonstrations it isn't. Perhaps there are some exceptional rules to be discovered, so I'll stay out of that, but I do want to discuss what I can talk about.

When you have a true statement of equality (ex. 1 = 1), you can multiply both sides by the same real number to end up with another true statement by the Reflexive Property of Equality. Now, with the below calculations, I know I am repeating what a few have said below.

0x = 0
x = 0/0

This does not prove x is 0. x could be any number in either of these two equations. This however may have something in it.

When you graph a line on a coordinate plane with no rise but a run of infinite length, the slope of the line is still known as 0. But screwing calculaic bypasses, graph some dot on the coordinate plane. It has no 2-dimensional slope, and logically and geometrically, 'no' is referred to as 0. But I thought, what if this is 3-dimensional graphing? The depth of this plotted 'point' could be any number, from negative infinity to 0 to infinity's absolute value.

The third dimension exists; therefore, 0/0 could be correctly defined by the range of all real numbers (its endpoints defined by unreal numbers).

Also, saying 0/0 is this range of numbers is still defining it, once a term is given. The quadratic equation can return two values in algebra: which one is the answer? It could be either one, could it not (except in geometrical cases)? This is still defining the value of x as either one of two things. Even saying x = x is defining x: When rewrote in English, x is x. Is that wrong or what?

Is his theory pointless, however? Yes, to you mathematicians. But it isn't to the technology engineers. It may not come of use to some, but this is insufficient for criticization. Geometry is just as official as algebra: They are both forms of mathematics that build this universe.

0/0 = 1
*0, *0
0 = 0

0/0 = 2
*0, *0
0 = 0
*1, *1
0 = 0

Either way, I believe I have succeeded in both. I'm just a sophomore, arrogant to some, yet even ignorance has taught not to hate, and it could teach more.

But, what I am twice as confident in is that x/0 is either infinity or -infinity, so long as x is not 0. Rays and lines, they both have infinite 'length'? In a coordinate plane, a 'line' with a slope of 0/0 really being just appearing as a point with no(=0) slope, as I have said above, can be a line with z-dimensional span of infinite length or with inequalities, a ray pointing towards or away from your face with its endpoint at the dot you drew.

BUT this does not mean that 0/0 is any number. Yes, the dot you drew could really be a 3-dimensionally-viewed segment of any length, since no equation or inequality has even defined it yet, only the TWO-dimensional slope, but in this third dimension, the slope is not 0/0. It is, if a line, x/0, where x is not 0 (It could be, though, in which case it is a point instead of a line, but just assume another real number value for x here.) Having a vertical slope, once the coordinate plane is 3-dimensionally turned vertically by 90 degrees, slope is any number/0. 1/0 = 2/0, as they both show the slope of the line as infinitely upwards towards the sky (or the wall in front of you, don't care).

Also, take a sheet of paper, and divide it into 0 pieces. How many times does it take to divide a sheet of paper into 0 pieces? Atoms cannot be created or destroyed, so it is impossible. No thing, machine or human or silly religious imaginations of 'God' will divide that sheet into 0 pieces. It is, however, possible for atoms to split. Still, infinte time is needed, and you will never consume infinite time, even if you are immortal.

0/0 may not equal 1/0, but 1/0 = 2/0 = 3/0 = halfway infinite possibilities for the numerator, where these instances are all positive numbers.

1/0 = infinity/0
*0, *0
0/0 = infinity*0/0
(cross-cancel 0 on the right fraction)
0/0 = infinity

I do not know what to say about that...but, this either cannot algebraicly OR should not be done! It just destroys geometry in such a silly contradiction; I'm sure there must be some property against this...."

DarkWizard_PitchBlackX
05-02-2007, 05:03 PM
To the article chaos master reported:

"Who'd have thought a fraction could cause so much controversy.

To sarah, zero out of zero 'things' may be considered 0 in quantity, when thinking geometrically, but in some nonphysical demonstrations it isn't. Perhaps there are some exceptional rules to be discovered, so I'll stay out of that, but I do want to discuss what I can talk about.

When you have a true statement of equality (ex. 1 = 1), you can multiply both sides by the same real number to end up with another true statement by the Reflexive Property of Equality. Now, with the below calculations, I know I am repeating what a few have said below.

0x = 0
x = 0/0

This does not prove x is 0. x could be any number in either of these two equations. This however may have something in it.

When you graph a line on a coordinate plane with no rise but a run of infinite length, the slope of the line is still known as 0. But screwing calculaic bypasses, graph some dot on the coordinate plane. It has no 2-dimensional slope, and logically and geometrically, 'no' is referred to as 0. But I thought, what if this is 3-dimensional graphing? The depth of this plotted 'point' could be any number, from negative infinity to 0 to infinity's absolute value.

The third dimension exists; therefore, 0/0 could be correctly defined by the range of all real numbers (its endpoints defined by unreal numbers).

Also, saying 0/0 is this range of numbers is still defining it, once a term is given. The quadratic equation can return two values in algebra: which one is the answer? It could be either one, could it not (except in geometrical cases)? This is still defining the value of x as either one of two things. Even saying x = x is defining x: When rewrote in English, x is x. Is that wrong or what?

Is his theory pointless, however? Yes, to you mathematicians. But it isn't to the technology engineers. It may not come of use to some, but this is insufficient for criticization. Geometry is just as official as algebra: They are both forms of mathematics that build this universe.

0/0 = 1
*0, *0
0 = 0

0/0 = 2
*0, *0
0 = 0
*1, *1
0 = 0

Either way, I believe I have succeeded in both. I'm just a sophomore, arrogant to some, yet even ignorance has taught not to hate, and it could teach more.

But, what I am twice as confident in is that x/0 is either infinity or -infinity, so long as x is not 0. Rays and lines, they both have infinite 'length'? In a coordinate plane, a 'line' with a slope of 0/0 really being just appearing as a point with no(=0) slope, as I have said above, can be a line with z-dimensional span of infinite length or with inequalities, a ray pointing towards or away from your face with its endpoint at the dot you drew.

BUT this does not mean that 0/0 is any number. Yes, the dot you drew could really be a 3-dimensionally-viewed segment of any length, since no equation or inequality has even defined it yet, only the TWO-dimensional slope, but in this third dimension, the slope is not 0/0. It is, if a line, x/0, where x is not 0 (It could be, though, in which case it is a point instead of a line, but just assume another real number value for x here.) Having a vertical slope, once the coordinate plane is 3-dimensionally turned vertically by 90 degrees, slope is any number/0. 1/0 = 2/0, as they both show the slope of the line as infinitely upwards towards the sky (or the wall in front of you, don't care).

Also, take a sheet of paper, and divide it into 0 pieces. How many times does it take to divide a sheet of paper into 0 pieces? Atoms cannot be created or destroyed, so it is impossible. No thing, machine or human or silly religious imaginations of 'God' will divide that sheet into 0 pieces. It is, however, possible for atoms to split. Still, infinte time is needed, and you will never consume infinite time, even if you are immortal.

0/0 may not equal 1/0, but 1/0 = 2/0 = 3/0 = halfway infinite possibilities for the numerator, where these instances are all positive numbers.

1/0 = infinity/0
*0, *0
0/0 = infinity*0/0
(cross-cancel 0 on the right fraction)
0/0 = infinity

I do not know what to say about that...but, this either cannot algebraicly OR should not be done! It just destroys geometry in such a silly contradiction; I'm sure there must be some property against this...."

Whoever let you out of the cage needs to be spanked...

Winston
11-20-2007, 07:47 PM
If you skin 18 monkeys. And sew the skins together. It makes a nice coat.
The same may apply to many animals of the same size or of larger grandeur. I have decided to make a formulae as i typed this...


A 18 = C

See? MY idea is quite plausable. And anyone can do it or understand it.

ridley
11-21-2007, 12:43 AM
XD

It is my theory that Mother Jenova and Father 'the' Norris created the universe.

Klendathu
11-21-2007, 07:22 AM
XD

It is my theory that Mother Jenova and Father 'the' Norris created the universe.

Not true.

Everyone knows that the Universe was sneezed out by the Great Green Arkleseizure.

Kit
11-21-2007, 08:06 AM
Cows have 4 legs.
Tables have 4 legs.
Therefore, Tables are Cows.

Kameo
11-21-2007, 04:13 PM
I fit in my jacket, my jacket fits in my suitcase, therefore I fit in my suitcase .....

Iconoclast
11-21-2007, 05:04 PM
Erm, thought I should mention I kind of don't believe in that theory I posted up there anymore after yet another long sit down.

A line whose slope is negative infinity would look as vertical as a line whose slope is positive infinity. Even though properties of algebraic equality led to invalid counterexamples, why choose the number on the right on the number line (infinity) instead of the one that comes before it (negative infinity)? And the two terms do exist, so I figured, meh.

Possibly, both are solutions to such an expression, but I just lately kind of lost my care about the matter. A vertical line can only be expressed by x = () and not y = (), trying to find a direct method of reaching y in a vertical line function is just not possible, so it's also possible neither are valid after all. :P God, I'm slow.

Llorona Bonita
11-21-2007, 10:11 PM
Muscles come and go; flab lasts. :D

Systemeth
11-22-2007, 07:18 PM
Cofnog is the single greatest achievement anywhere EVER.
Also the Bible merely resulted from God trolling a forum and someone saying "sigged!".
And the great handkerchief will never come.

Lastly, everyone has a zergling growing inside them.
Just because.

Winston
12-26-2007, 09:57 AM
Want to hear a Hell Of a Crazy Theory?

Our Actual god is called Ello Heim. He gave birth to jesus and lucifer. Jesus came to earth as a god representitive. Jesus has sex with many women and had many children which would also hope to acheive godhood.

This is what many people attempt to do today. There is also a lot of other " B S" but its too pointless to write...

Wait...I think i heard of this somewhere before...Any one know it?

I think their called morons? lol

1Marko1
02-03-2008, 04:25 AM
well this is in Macedonian so ill try to translatae

Ebi ucenje
Uci Ebenje

**** Studying
Study ****ing

DarkWizard_PitchBlackX
02-05-2008, 08:15 PM
Here's a theory for ya'lls.

Who is this creature who has an insatiable love for the dead? [Living Dead Girl]

Wicked_Will
10-22-2008, 08:54 PM
Sometimes I wonder if someone could completely and totally change their reality.

Why? Well, pretty much our entire reality, and the way we perceive it, are the combined results of our senses telling us what we think the world is. Now, when we have someone who is deaf, or blind, etc, their other sense usually pick up the slack. Not only that, but due to their lack of that sense, they have to pretty much use their imagination to view the world "normally." So, really, the way they really view the world is much different from the way you or I view it. Now, imagine if we could change our senses to actually change the way we view reality. Imagine if we could control the way our senses think, to be able to see what we want to see, hear what we want to hear. (although I suppose that already happens sometimes. xD ) Wouldn't that just be awesome?

Well, I dunno if I explained it well, but it makes sense to me in my head. :D

Darth Gazak
10-28-2008, 01:35 PM
Religion starts wars. Science finishes them.

That's a quote from me, by the way, used it in an essay i wrote last year. Hopefully it will make me famous. I'd need to attatch my real name to it first though.

Systemeth
10-28-2008, 06:38 PM
Religion starts wars. Science finishes them... at the cost of everything you know and love.

XD, I like this better.

Wicked_Will
10-31-2008, 05:22 PM
XD, I like this better.

Why would it cost you everything you know and love?

drawnbeyondthelines
11-05-2008, 03:18 PM
heres mien how the uniiverse stats and ends you know what im saying?

OK so, everyone knwos since the "big bang" , the unvierse has been expanding ever since, btu scientists predicted in about a trillion years the universe will run out of gravity to hold itself together and it will all collapse on it self..


well i think you know how they dont knwo what started the big band, religous ppl say "god!" or "allah!" or whatever way you swing,, but i think once the universe collapses, all tha mattar will explode out again and recreate a new universe, thus stating how ours was started,

but then more questions comes up, how did this all startin the begining:|

tatsuya1221
11-05-2008, 11:09 PM
That scientists are keeping the proof of god's existence secret because if it got out the world would change drastically.

Wicked_Will
11-06-2008, 05:40 PM
That scientists are keeping the proof of god's existence secret because if it got out the world would change drastically.

Well, that's a crazy one alright. xD

drawnbeyondthelines
11-06-2008, 06:54 PM
thats pretty WACKY if i do say so myself.

SofaKing
11-08-2008, 06:19 PM
heres a 'theory' a friend of mine came up with about American government.

ok, so America’s students are like way dumber then people in other countries. Even kids who graduate high school in Africa are smarter then American high school grads, Japanese and Chinese destroy us in smartness, and pretty much every other country's high school grads are smarter then ours. This is because the American government wants its people to be stupid because 'stupid people do what their told'. Back in the 60's everyone had to take economics and government and a bunch of other classes every year (not being alive in the 60's I wouldn’t know how accurate that part is but we defiantly don’t have to take them classes now anyway.) then in the 70's people started protesting stuff and complaining to the government about stuff so the government decided to make everyone stupid so they wouldn’t protest stuff. That’s why almost every hotel and convince store you find here in America is run by an Arab or a Chinese person. Because they are all smart in their country and they see how our government is making us stupid so they come over and act all smart and get all the good jobs.... or something like that.

What do you think?

Iconoclast
11-08-2008, 06:28 PM
Kinda ironic to freedom. That sounds like only part of it though. :P

From what I've heard about education in other countries material and tests seem to be more 'slow' for the learning period, but it's a hella lot less wacky than in here--the teachers sometimes misinformed or couldn't get a job elsewhere maybe being other reasons. There's some really screwed up teachers in this country; I won't waste my time on stories. XD

SofaKing
11-08-2008, 06:37 PM
o, what country is that?

Iconoclast
11-08-2008, 07:05 PM
Man and that one guy had this really nice pimp walk with the cane...

SofaKing
11-08-2008, 08:09 PM
bet mine is better

doesnt really answer my question though

MurderMayhem666
11-14-2008, 01:09 PM
heres a 'theory' a friend of mine came up with about American government.

ok, so America’s students are like way dumber then people in other countries. Even kids who graduate high school in Africa are smarter then American high school grads, Japanese and Chinese destroy us in smartness, and pretty much every other country's high school grads are smarter then ours. This is because the American government wants its people to be stupid because 'stupid people do what their told'. Back in the 60's everyone had to take economics and government and a bunch of other classes every year (not being alive in the 60's I wouldn’t know how accurate that part is but we defiantly don’t have to take them classes now anyway.) then in the 70's people started protesting stuff and complaining to the government about stuff so the government decided to make everyone stupid so they wouldn’t protest stuff. That’s why almost every hotel and convince store you find here in America is run by an Arab or a Chinese person. Because they are all smart in their country and they see how our government is making us stupid so they come over and act all smart and get all the good jobs.... or something like that.

What do you think?

:mad3:That is dead on with what i think !!!! The Government wants to make you dumb so you don't get in the way of the people who actually matter !!! It makes me sick to my stomach to think what the "Military Industrial Complex" has been doing to this country for the past 50 years. What this Country needs is a Second Revolution but the problem is the people are to damn dumb to get it started .:mad2:

Yojilk
12-02-2008, 02:25 PM
They get their ways at doiing that too, hey lookit us, hooked to video games, their dangerous yet so loved drug! :P Japan Will rule us one of this days thanks to them:D

tylerderbun
12-03-2008, 12:38 PM
Government needs to kill God in the public forum because it doesnt want the citizenry to adhere to a set of standards or moral supercedes its ideas.

So in a sense, Government needs to kill God in order to become God.

]{ings_Pwn
12-06-2008, 03:34 PM
My crazy theory is that everybody here seriously believes the stuff they're writing >_>

Stroh
12-07-2008, 08:53 AM
I think .99999999999.... should NOT equal 1 unfortunately it does...

x = .9999999...
so
10x = 9.999999....
subtract x from each side
9x = 9

OMG X =1 dammit

>_< damn Discrete Math.

SofaKing
12-11-2008, 08:47 PM
I think .99999999999.... should NOT equal 1 unfortunately it does...

x = .9999999...
so
10x = 9.999999....
subtract x from each side
9x = 9

OMG X =1 dammit

>_< damn Discrete Math.

i think the 9x = 9 part is wrong wouldnt it be
9x= 8.9999999999999999999999....
then divide 8.99999..... by 9 and it comes back to .999999999.... which is not =1

or were you not being seriouse and i'm just being a douche by trying to prove you wrong?

Pizza1295
12-12-2008, 04:01 PM
i think that aliens kidnap cows,and we kidnap aliens,and cows kdinap us,and Christmas trees(third party) steals a lil of all,while we kidnap Christmas trees and aliens take water,and then ofc cows take milk outta there utters

basically, we are ALL(including aliens) thieving basterds

Kilghard Wolf
12-12-2008, 04:22 PM
basically, we are ALL(including aliens) thieving basterds

I could've told you that. My theory is different though.

Pizza1295
12-13-2008, 07:59 AM
i believe,after seeing Indiana Jones crystal skull, that movies give hints to what is going on in real life

so basically,steal everything from area 51

edit:kilghard,why didnt you say it then :P

Kilghard Wolf
12-13-2008, 01:09 PM
My theory about everyone being theiving *******s is that they are because I say so. ;)

Ss4gogeta0
12-13-2008, 09:44 PM
my theory is that men dont kill people
ignorant and intolerant people kill people

MurderMayhem666
12-24-2008, 10:34 AM
my theory is that men dont kill people
ignorant and intolerant people kill people

:) Intolerant people don't kill people. The Government kills people, duh !!! :)

SofaKing
12-24-2008, 12:42 PM
my theory is that mm6 doesnt like the goverment

MurderMayhem666
12-24-2008, 02:32 PM
my theory is that mm6 doesnt like the goverment

:D And I think you would be right, LOL. :D

Shermo1984
12-25-2008, 09:23 PM
:) Intolerant people don't kill people. The Government kills people, duh !!! :)

lol thats pretty funny

maunty GX
01-02-2009, 12:56 PM
I have a theory... I donno f the technology capable to acheive it... :confused:

we know that the diamond molecule contains synchronized chain of carbon atoms... likewise.. the formation of diamond process demands certain factors ... extrem compression and heat to the coal.. within defined period to become diamond eventually...

but.... what if there any techneque applys for grabbing the carbon atoms excisting in carbon di-oxide that we exhale it or emitting out of the cars exhaust tools....etc..??

regardless of the device that convert this idea to the vertual realm... the value of diamonds will be dropped down and thanks to the excessive production of it to gratitude the "greedy instinct" of the human... in the other hand... the advantages of diamond will be used for several people with lesser income.. or even more.. the diamonds will be utilized for new applications.. imagine guys... to see towers built of diamond.. or custumized substitutional budy part like bones used for surgical applications... beside.. this concept would be even more useful for military research for national defence system like building shilters made of diamond to get the advantage of diamonds hardness beside inventing laesers weapons uses the diamond as fuel..

I propose to assemble parts that use the laeser as a medium prompting molecular excitment aimed to restricted amount of saturated Co2 gas to separate the O2 from C atom , subequently emit another directed laeser to gather carbon atoms within synchronized chain counterpart to the carbon chain of real diamond , at least this process will clean our enviroment by wiping off carbon di-oxide to reduce heat :D, but there is one bummer to worry about... what if all these things cause disturbance of gases distribution??? you know... nitrogen freezes things if it was concentrated,and pure oxegyn matter !!! if our planet surrounded by pure oxegyn after consuming each Co2 molecule, tiny sparkle is enough to explode our planet, then... BYE BYE MAMA EARTH... to avoid such insedence, we have import Co2 from Mars.... funny aye!!!?..

wooooooooow.... it is pretty difficult to anticipate the ideas based on this prencible !!!...

what do you think guys?? interresting huh !!?.... :)

gimme my nobile cool award as my exclusive patent... :D

maunty GX
01-02-2009, 03:20 PM
my theory is if we found a way to preserve a persons brain and if we hooked a mechanical heart and limbs and stuff to it... we could be immortal robots!

it would be great if we can customize our budy :p

I would have a jet engine for me own.... beside .. it sounds great if can get equipped the abilities of my oppenent once I kick his *** :devil:
mmmmm... such idea sounds familier to me :skep:

Winston
01-02-2009, 06:56 PM
yes! we can be like gundams and armored core people!

Ummm. Halo Much too?

Winston
01-02-2009, 06:58 PM
Pretty? Lol

But they're not cool! Like Master Chief. And he's a patriot. Gundams are Japanese robots witch could be used to take over the earth?

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:03 PM
PLEASE lol. Marine Corps? Its Super Americanized.

And yes, your a nazi. lol

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:07 PM
When I think of gundam I think of a retarded propane powered lawnmower that some drunk japanese designed? haha

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:16 PM
LMAO!

Gundams are commy socialist *******s. Are you a commy? Do you believe in dictatorship and and do you love Fidel Castro? I Think you just might.

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:27 PM
Are you related to hitler?

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:31 PM
Actually I Do, I'm Catholic. So yeah you are haha

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:39 PM
Yeah I went over that theory too, like a million times in my head. But gotta tell you some of the long lost cousins I have are really pretty haha

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:42 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I'm A Canadian Conservative, Ultra-right wing ( The nazi part still fits I guess ), but definitely not a COMMY! And may I die right now, If I ever relate myself to Gundam!

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:52 PM
Lets thinks, genocide here, I COULD KILL ALL OF THEM! RARRRR

Winston
01-02-2009, 07:56 PM
Gee Golly Gosh? lol

Well, I guess some sacrifices must be made! Even for someone as lovely as you haha.

Now there's a wacky theory :P

Winston
01-02-2009, 08:00 PM
Lovely is just a saying. Maybe I was being sarcastic haha

Winston
01-02-2009, 08:04 PM
I do... Gundam is Actually my FAVORITE anime lol...

PFFT In your dreams

Winston
01-02-2009, 08:06 PM
Actually Flying Pigs Would be Delicious.

But if you put jelly on a cays back ( grape ) it will not fall on its feet but instead float.

Winston
01-02-2009, 08:11 PM
Nope, Jelly. Peanut Butter has too many flaws in it. What if it were chunky missy?

AHH Got you there.

Winston
01-02-2009, 08:17 PM
Pfft, if by flaws then I meant heavy good looks, lmao

Winston
01-02-2009, 08:25 PM
My house has skippy peanut butter! THE BEST

And thats no whacky theory!

Winston
01-02-2009, 08:36 PM
Well if Chuck Norris could chuck wood, and in which he can, there would be no wood left in the world as he would toss all of it in to the sun

Winston
01-03-2009, 11:22 AM
Hmm, I guess its more of a fact. But it disproves your theory completely!

Winston
01-03-2009, 11:31 AM
Yes, but chuck would chuck it all before they could.

Winston
01-03-2009, 11:49 AM
Well he doesn't have to but then I could pop out, what if wood chucks didn't? I mean to many variants here. And what if we got hit by an asteroid? hm?

Winston
01-03-2009, 12:11 PM
Your ALWAYS a meany pants! haha. Yes I have a gerbil in my left pocket, and a leprechaun in the right. Of course I live on the moon though.

Winston
01-03-2009, 12:27 PM
How else would I get to earth STUPID! haha ;) I thought it was obvious. You ever see that movie?

Winston
01-03-2009, 12:51 PM
Its by the beatles, The yellow submarine. Its amazingly weirs and good haha

Winston
01-03-2009, 01:19 PM
Nope, there's more to it! Want me to link you up to a stream possibly?

Winston
01-03-2009, 07:18 PM
http://tvshack.net/movies/Yellow_Submarine__1968_/

This is for people who want to pretend their high...

Winston
01-03-2009, 07:35 PM
Haha, Well I drink alcohol and thats as far as I think I'll ever go haha...

But umm, if you ever did watch this movie high.. Holy crap, you'd have a hella good time haha

Winston
01-03-2009, 08:19 PM
Aahahah, As if your high lmao

SofaKing
01-04-2009, 03:30 AM
my theory is that winston and alicia just pwnd this thread

Winston
01-04-2009, 09:44 PM
Thats probably a valid theory. But heres a better one.

Anarchism... HOW MUCH WHACKIER CAN YA GET! :p

MurderMayhem666
01-05-2009, 07:50 AM
:) Here's my Crazed and Wacky theory. :)

The early Middle Ages (614-911 A.D.) never occurred. Everything that supposedly happened during those years was either a misunderstanding, an event from a different era, or an outright lie - Charlemagne, for instance, is a fictional figure. And we are actually living in the 1700s.


:) Don't any of you try and deny this either. This has been right in front of your faces for years and I am the first to realize it. :)

SofaKing
01-05-2009, 08:25 AM
so that means the world isnt going to end in our 2012 because its actully only 1709 right now. That means i still got 303 years of life left.

MurderMayhem666
01-05-2009, 09:01 AM
so that means the world isnt going to end in our 2012 because its actully only 1709 right now. That means i still got 303 years of life left.

:) Exactly my friend, exactly. Oh pass this story along because we need to get the word out that we are all being lied to. :)

MurderMayhem666
01-05-2009, 09:46 AM
wait what? 1709...?

:mad3: YEAH !!! And the damn government doesn't want you to know. :mad3:

MurderMayhem666
01-05-2009, 10:23 AM
:mad3: How do you think they did it. Martha Stewart and her ultra mega magic microwave. DUH !!! :mad3:

Winston
01-05-2009, 02:00 PM
Martha stewart can actually shove a turkey up her own butt... ( Reference : Southpark ).

You guys didn't know it was only 1709? Oh yeahhh... American Government not Canadian. See Over here, no one lies.. baha

If all hamsters would run in unison on their wheels either forward or in reverse time would follow the same direction.

MurderMayhem666
01-06-2009, 08:20 AM
:D Okay, hers another theroy of mine. WWII was staged. It never really happened. The Illuminati employed elaborate special effects, stage magic, and phony journalism to scare the world into pacifism. Am I the only one who thinks this ??? :D

MurderMayhem666
01-06-2009, 11:08 AM
my hamster died like a week ago... :(

:mad2: And what does this have to do with anything ??? :mad2:

Winston
01-06-2009, 02:16 PM
Well Then time will be ****ed forever until a new one spawns from its ashes

Pizza1295
01-06-2009, 02:53 PM
i believe hamsters dont make time,they ARE time

Winston
01-06-2009, 02:54 PM
Time makes time therefore hamsters make time! GOSH

Winston
01-06-2009, 07:13 PM
God... Gosh don't be silly

Ss4gogeta0
01-08-2009, 12:26 PM
ummm wow.... anyway when i think of gundam i think of japanese people meets trojan condoms... magnum=gundam and so on

Fantasy_Freak
01-20-2009, 02:09 PM
therefore what makes hamsters?

Rainbows and Happy Thoughts.

tatsuya1221
01-20-2009, 02:23 PM
Another wacky theory i have is that gackt is 400 years old...oh wait, he's the one who claimed that.

Fantasy_Freak
01-21-2009, 12:52 AM
I have another theory now. It's about hunters.

They say we often have to kill animals to make sure they don't eat too much of their food supply and starve to death (Basically suffer)

So if we go one of those 3rd world countries and we see a kid starving to death do they want us to kill them?

Apperently so, because if not then they want children to suffer.

I have a plan though to solve world hunger.
I'll tell you tommorrow.

MurderMayhem666
01-25-2009, 08:58 PM
Another wacky theory i have is that gackt is 400 years old...oh wait, he's the one who claimed that.

:confused: Who in the hell is this "Gackt" ??? :confused:

e21flesh
01-25-2009, 09:11 PM
Heres mine, the soul resides in the pinal gland, or the 3rd eye. This isn't really my theory it's Rick Strassman's theory, but I tend to think it's interesting. I also find it interesting that people who have done DMT have talked to "higher intelligences". I myself have never done DMT but I have done massive amounts of mushrooms. I have had 2 out of body experiences where in one occasion I talked with what seemed to be a "higher intelligence". So my other question is are hallucinogens here for a reason?

tatsuya1221
01-26-2009, 12:27 AM
:confused: Who in the hell is this "Gackt" ??? :confused:

He's the guy who sung this song:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRt2-XPfTEk

Believe it or not gackt is so popular in japan that 2 game characters have been modeled after him, i can't remember the first one but the second one was genesis in dirge of cerebus final fantasy 7.

MurderMayhem666
01-26-2009, 08:52 PM
He's the guy who sung this song:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRt2-XPfTEk

Believe it or not gackt is so popular in japan that 2 game characters have been modeled after him, i can't remember the first one but the second one was genesis in dirge of cerebus final fantasy 7.

:D Another thing I didn't know. :D

Winston
01-27-2009, 05:44 PM
Crazy, But I Actually Think Gato's Song On Chrono Trigger Kicks ***, I whistle It every day

Kairen Skellington
01-28-2009, 06:51 AM
Crazy, But I Actually Think Gato's Song On Chrono Trigger Kicks ***, I whistle It every day

Chrono Trigger alone kicks ***. Hehe!

Winston
01-28-2009, 06:54 AM
Very true, and thats "no" Theory haha

Ss4gogeta0
01-28-2009, 01:23 PM
Lets thinks, genocide here, I COULD KILL ALL OF THEM! RARRRR

ORRRRRRR
you can let me do the genocide while u watch and laugh like hitler... ya national socialist

!CoNvOy
02-20-2009, 04:56 PM
I predict that the world is going to end in 82 years during WWIII

MurderMayhem666
02-20-2009, 05:40 PM
I predict that the world is going to end in 82 years during WWIII

:confused: And you base this on what ??? :confused:

tatsuya1221
02-28-2009, 12:42 PM
I predict that the world is going to end in 82 years during WWIII

Might want to shorten that a few decades.

Oh my crazy theory?
I think i'm a demon god who came to pwn teh devil because i'm a bad***.

EDIT:WTF, it didn't language filter on it's own lol.

Winston
03-05-2009, 08:40 PM
Might want to shorten that a few decades.

Oh my crazy theory?
I think i'm a demon god who came to pwn teh devil because i'm a bad***.

EDIT:WTF, it didn't language filter on it's own lol.

If you honestly think thats true, the shorten a few decades. Your a moron haha.

...Um, Classical music will come back hardcore... at least it his for me... haha

Grethum
03-20-2009, 12:31 PM
I honestly think that all these things we see in sci-fi are possible ( except for time travel as I stated in the time thread) I mean we as humans use only like 10% of our brain? ( As you can see i think i use a little less >.>) What if we were able to use the other 90%? things we cant even imagine would be possible! We also would probably realize that this whole "Human Nature" stereotype is just something that is real because we believe it to be.

My random (most likely unoriginal and useless theory)

Winston
03-20-2009, 01:01 PM
Oh No Its Awfully Orginal Bahaha...

What makes that base theory more interesting is when you start taking it to a quantum level. To the point where we have questioned our own existences. Question what is really there.

In reality, with the absence of light, does anything really exist? We can't see it, so is it there. We only see objects because light bouncing off of those objects in to our eyes are interpreted as so.

If we used 90% of our brains, perhaps we'd see beyond what we do now, and realize a whole new world.

SirAllred
05-05-2009, 04:42 AM
Throw away Religon and rely on what we do know to survive?

Yeah, it's 2 crazy.....

Pengitty
05-05-2009, 08:11 AM
so that means the world isnt going to end in our 2012 because its actully only 1709 right now. That means i still got 303 years of life left.

2012 on the Mayan calender (which is when the world should end) was 2007 by our calender. Thankfully we're still here and able to game.

Here is a crazy theory:

Maybe Metal Gear Solid's story is real! O.O
The governments contacted a trusted "PR" member to create a game to draw people's attentions away from what is really going on, by putting what is going on right in front of people's faces. This PR person is Hideo Kojima! O.O

Perhaps he works for the Patriots. MGS4 is actually a training ground for what the governments want the world to become. They give it to us to play with so we can say "cool! I wanna do that" and slowly creep it up on us.

One more crazy theory!

Maybe... just maybe... the universe is a giant organism and all that is inside of it are living parts or cells of this being. Our is existence is actually that of a type of virus or bacteria within this organism infecting the Earth cell o.o

GameGeeks
05-05-2009, 08:27 AM
We're all just a tiny crumb in someones empty pie tin.

SirAllred
05-11-2009, 06:10 PM
"Perhaps he works for the Patriots. MGS4 is actually a training ground for what the governments want the world to become. They give it to us to play with so we can say "cool! I wanna do that" and slowly creep it up on us."

Just recently jokes around with a freind about how Assassin's creed a is a great training ground for that very reason. The Ending also fits hand-in-hand.

tatsuya1221
05-16-2009, 03:22 PM
I'm a 26,000 + year old immortal who cannot die no matter how much he wants to, that's my "theory".

If your wondering, i'm not kidding, i'm just posting this since everyone seems to want to know if i'm joking lately, i rarely joke, and i never intentionally lie.

GameGeeks
05-16-2009, 03:25 PM
Tell us something we don't know. :p

tatsuya1221
05-16-2009, 03:28 PM
Tell us something we don't know. :p

Barak obama is **** cheney's 8th cousin.

GameGeeks
05-16-2009, 03:31 PM
I think that's kinda obvious.

tatsuya1221
05-16-2009, 03:34 PM
I think that's kinda obvious.

They, along with every us president so far(excluding reagan i believe), are also related to the english royals too.

GameGeeks
05-16-2009, 03:35 PM
Pics or it didn't happen. :p

tatsuya1221
05-16-2009, 03:40 PM
Pics or it didn't happen. :p

aw, come on:
http://www.coolrom.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=87&pictureid=1224

GameGeeks
05-16-2009, 03:41 PM
Ok, where's my cookie?

tatsuya1221
05-16-2009, 03:43 PM
Ok, where's my cookie?

right behi...THE COOKIE MONSTER!!

GameGeeks
05-16-2009, 03:45 PM
Great, now look what you made me do.

http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj67/hippychikky1977/cookie_monster_dead.jpg

tatsuya1221
05-16-2009, 03:47 PM
Great, now look what you made me do.

http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj67/hippychikky1977/cookie_monster_dead.jpg

Meh, he was a thieving jerk anyway, and he kept saying the f word all the time.

GameGeeks
05-16-2009, 03:49 PM
I wonder if his stomach is full of cookies.

Carlrt
05-17-2009, 11:46 PM
My ''far out'' theory would have to be............

Organised Religion

now thats just crazy

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-07-2009, 07:49 AM
The question is:
What are we, What are we doing. What is the purpose of this life.
Why we exist, why animal and plant exist. Why only this world
The phi ratio. The mountains, honey, spermatozoa. Male and female.
Iron falling from sky. What our soul made of.

This are 100% correct Answers using simple math.

Science + Stupidty= Darwenism
Science / Religion = Atheisim

But you know this one.

Science + Religion= ??????????????
Science x Religion= ???????????


?????????????? x or +n2 ????????????? = ?????????????????

Come and I will show the answer

Post Screptum:
Dont think ever I mean never think or put in thought I am in any way
converting you

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 08:01 AM
Simply asking "why" does not conclude that there is a purpose to be divined.

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-07-2009, 08:17 AM
Simply asking "why" does not conclude that there is a purpose to be divined.

Divine is there such a thing divine.
Then who or what is Divine

I have the answers. Come with me [p.msg]
and I will put it into details.

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 08:23 AM
Divine (sic) is there such a thing divine.
Then who or what is Divine
You are waxing philosophically, not theorizing.

I have the answers. Come with me [p.msg]
and I will put it into details.

Nahhh, let's be open.

If you have a theory, put it forth and support it with verifiable evidence.

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-07-2009, 08:29 AM
You are waxing philosophically, not theorizing.



Nahhh, let's be open.

If you have a theory, put it forth and support it with verifiable evidence.

But here is the problem people starts thinking I am converting them
Biology teacher have quoted [ carbon date man carbon date]

Then I said ok register your ticket and lets go
carbon date the facts.

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 08:35 AM
But here is the problem people starts thinking I am converting them
I do not know what conversion you are referring to.
I have no fear of conversion, myself, however, If you are trying to discuss religion- given what I have seen around here, I would advise you stick to discussing science ONLY here.
Science consists of theory- which is based on a hypothesis that is tested and observations made. This produces independently verifiable evidence.
If you do not have these things, you are not theorizing and the topic would probably not work out in a science section.

Biology teacher have quoted [ carbon date man carbon date]

Then I said ok register your ticket and lets go
carbon date the facts.
I think you are trying to refer to Radiometric dating.
Either way, Radiometric Dating is independently verifiable as accurate.

Independently verifiable means that you can study and learn and test it and examine the results all for yourself. You don't need to take anyone's word for it.

Edit to add: In order to discuss religious aspects- taking this to PM.
But scientific aspects- I will only discuss here.

tatsuya1221
07-07-2009, 08:37 AM
Drop the religious talk, both of you, had enough problems with that yesterday.

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-07-2009, 08:40 AM
I guess you didn't Saw my formula

A religion which harmonly lives with science.

Mountain, honey and Melting okkaay you wanted that way fine. But
its R combiend with S okk

Quote me so that I can reply

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 08:43 AM
Drop the religious talk, both of you, had enough problems with that yesterday.
I did not discuss religion at all- except to say what you came and said after me.
My posts stand in my favor.

tatsuya1221
07-07-2009, 08:44 AM
I did not discuss religion at all- except to say what you came and said after me.
My posts stand in my favor.

I'm just saying take ot to visitor messages or pm's, for 1 it can't get out of hand and 2, you won't be going way off topic.

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 08:47 AM
I'm just saying take ot to visitor messages or pm's, for 1 it can't get out of hand and 2, you won't be going way off topic.

Which I had added in an edit just before you posted.

Any more concerns?

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-07-2009, 08:48 AM
Fact no 1.

Iron caming from sky

We know our dear friend Hydrogen in the sun uses as a fuel.
But do you know the by product. Helium.

Then what that gotta do with iron you say?

It says here you know element changes to another.
Like hydrogen, every thing changes including mass, size and
poperties.

Still don't get it?

To get iron you need a tempreture of 70,000,000 C
The sun might not provide that much heat.

The conversion also needs Time. Some million light year maybe


Wait for part 2

tatsuya1221
07-07-2009, 08:51 AM
Which I had added in an edit just before you posted.

Any more concerns?

As long as you stay on topic, i don't care tbh, and it doesn't get out of hand like we did that one time, that said, everytime religion is brought up on these forums it becomes a problem.

I'm telling you, religion and politics, 2 things that should never be discussed on forums.

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 09:02 AM
Fact no 1.

Iron caming from sky

We know our dear friend Hydrogen in the sun uses as a fuel.
But do you know the by product. Helium.

Then what that gotta do with iron you say?

It says here you know element changes to another.
Like hydrogen, every thing changes including mass, size and
poperties.

Still don't get it?

To get iron you need a tempreture of 70,000,000 C
The sun might not provide that much heat.

The conversion also needs Time. Some million light year maybe


Wait for part 2

Please organize your presentation.

Iron came 'falling from the sky'? This is a very vague description.
If you would like to get technical, iron falls upon the Earth almost daily. Mostly as dust. Occasionally, we get larger chunks that include Iron, pyrites, carbon and everyones favorite: Iridium.

What you next refer to is Hydrogen Fusion. Our Sun fuses hydrogen producing deuterium. Deuterium and Hydrogen fuse to produce Helium-3. And So on.
Given current spectrophotometry of the Sun, it's likely that the Sun will continue to fuse Hydrogen for several billion years, considering the content available and rate of fusion.
After that, it's likely to burn Helium. At this stage, it enters the Red Giant Phase of it's existence.

Clearly, the Iron content we have abundant in the Solar System did not come from the Sun. I have no idea where you even thought that such was the case. In fact, the Sun also contains Iron from the primordial forming system that our Sol system originated from.

Also, Light years are a measurement of distance. Not time.

Then again... Han Solo made the kessel run in however many "parsecs..." :p ;)
ETA: I might point out that I find it curious that you allude to the notion that the Iron may have come from the Sun, then dismiss the notion.
To those of us in the Astronomy circle, it's quite well known that the Sun is not the source of our Iron, nor our water. In fact, our Sun shares the same source from which we have those elements.
This is why I asked that you organize your presentation. No allusions, please.

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-07-2009, 09:20 AM
Please organize your presentation.

Iron came 'falling from the sky'? This is a very vague description.
If you would like to get technical, iron falls upon the Earth almost daily. Mostly as dust. Occasionally, we get larger chunks that include Iron, pyrites, carbon and everyones favorite: Iridium.

What you next refer to is Hydrogen Fusion. Our Sun fuses hydrogen producing deuterium. Deuterium and Hydrogen fuse to produce Helium-3. And So on.
Given current spectrophotometry of the Sun, it's likely that the Sun will continue to fuse Hydrogen for several billion years, considering the content available and rate of fusion.
After that, it's likely to burn Helium. At this stage, it enters the Red Giant Phase of it's existence.

Clearly, the Iron content we have abundant in the Solar System did not come from the Sun. I have no idea where you even thought that such was the case. In fact, the Sun also contains Iron from the primordial forming system that our Sol system originated from.


Fact no1 prt2

Thank you for the info now.

As you have said we always getting dust of Various material on daily bases, iron is one special.

At the time of crea.... soryy no R

When earth was a soft surface, 65,0000,000 years ago. A super nova occurred long before then.

When the star exploded the right amount of energy required to make
a Iron was made. Up untill it reached earth soft spongy surface
and mixed with other material. Due to its density it sunk deep into earth crust, and cobalt and nickel iron based material made the earth core am I right.

Can you tell me what Metals can get attracted by magnetism,
also the blood hemoglobin have what content.

Next the earth magnate field. And the polarity.
No life without iron as it was attracting its first form HYDROGEN.
for example water next atmosphere.

That's it folks keep this fact ok.

And can you tell me which century they discover all this.

Next episode is of mountains
Fact no2

And rememba the atomic numba of Iron [26]

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 09:37 AM
Ok
First allow me to point out that your "facts" are not facts. Stop presenting things as "FACT!" like you're a lysol commercial. It's not going to fool anyone.


When earth was a soft surface, 65,0000,000 years ago. A super nova occurred long before then.
Say what?
Do you have any observations of a supernova remnant?

Needless to say, I already know the answer to this question...


When the star exploded the right amount of energy required to make
a Iron was made.
A supernova can produce Uranium.
Up untill it reached earth soft spongy surface
and mixed with other material. Due to its density it sunk deep into earth crust, and cobalt and nickel iron based material made the earth core am I right.
No. You are not correct.
For one, I have no idea what this supposed 650 million year old spongy Earth is. Where did you get that number from?
The Earth was no "spongier" 650 million years ago than today, given geological evidence.

What the heck do you even mean by spongy?
Can you tell me what Metals can get attracted by magnetism,
also the blood hemoglobin have what content.
You ask this allusion directly after implying as "FACT!" that some Iron producing event occurred after the origin of Life.

Nonsense.

The heavy elements that can be produced in a supernova are FAR more likely to have been the very constituents which pooled into the forming solar system in the first place.

There is No Evidence that a recent Supernova bombarded our solar system many million years ago that provided us with elements we lacked previous.

This is a big part of why your proclamations as fact detract from your argument.
Next the earth magnate field. And the polarity.
No life without iron as it was attracting its first form HYDROGEN.
for example water next atmosphere.
None of this paragraph makes any sense. I have no idea how to respond to it. I cannot tell what your claim is here.

You refer to the Earths Magnetic field. But the Magnetic Field is a Product of the Massive amount of Iron in the Earths Core!

The reason Earth has a Magnetic Field to the degree that it does is that the Earth has a large chunk of Iron Spinning within it.
The Earth is not a solid ball. If you took a Gigantic pair of Pinchers into Outer space and squeezed the Earth, it would flex and break open- magma would ooze out. It would break into globules.
Because of the fluid dynamics, the outside- Crust- spins at a different rate than the core does. Mag..Neato:p

So this argument you just alluded to is chock full of holes- and irrelevant anyway considering that your "FACT!" of Supernova Bombardment of Earth with heavy elements in recent history has no support.
The Solar System itself is more likely to have Coalesced from remnants- as the galactic arm rotated about the hub. This would be Long Before the Earth had even clumped together and before the Big Whack (Theory of the Moons origin).


That's it folks keep this fact ok.
Hmmmmmmmmm

Instead of asking questions and alluding to illusions- Present a solid case. Support your case with evidence. Not made up figures that you proclaim to be facts.

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-07-2009, 09:48 AM
For the sake of our dear friend hypothesis OK not fact finish happy.

Will I don't know what you gonna call this.

Mountains

Well you know mountains I don't know about your research I think, you know
mountains works as a holder of some kind. Right as the above part is just a minor
part the actual part dug in deep.

And keep the whole Iron part OK.

And for the next part

Phi ratio



Phi

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 09:50 AM
For the sake of our dear friend hypothesis OK not fact finish happy.

Will I don't know what you gonna call this.

Mountains

Well you know mountains I don't know about your research I think, you know
mountains works as a holder of some kind. Right as the above part is just a minor
part the actual part dug in deep.

And keep the whole Iron part OK.

And for the next part

Phi ratio



Phi

Can we address the current claims on the table before moving on to more, please?

GameGeeks
07-07-2009, 09:51 AM
My crazy theory is I'm turning into a slug. Quick get a princess to kiss me. :p

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-07-2009, 09:53 AM
Can we address the current claims on the table before moving on to more, please?

Ok How about visitor mesaging ok

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 10:01 AM
My crazy theory is I'm turning into a slug. Quick get a princess to kiss me. :p

I have visions of a princess and frog from Family Guy...
Ok How about visitor mesaging ok

We can discuss anything inappropriate for the subforum in Private Messaging.

But the scientific discussion belongs here.

GameGeeks
07-07-2009, 10:16 AM
There's also this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZS4mcAALUBY&feature=channel_page) one by the same guy.

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 10:24 AM
There's also this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZS4mcAALUBY&feature=channel_page) one by the same guy.

That's the one.

GameGeeks
07-07-2009, 10:26 AM
That's not from family guy. Just the guy who creates it.

Aravisian
07-07-2009, 10:28 AM
That's not from family guy. Just the guy who creates it.

Oh ok. I thought it had been one of those .. flash...somewhere elses that Family Guy does.

Like the drunk Donkey in the bar.

My Mistake.

ETA:
Ok maybe I meant stubborn as a donkey?

Oh I need help...
anyway... for your viewing off topic pleasure...:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ-Okkpgeh4&feature=related

axel1
07-08-2009, 06:08 AM
My whacky theory is that you could possible modify human DNA to make humans grow 40 foot tall, fly and be impervious to most weapons and all known diseases. But I guess transhumanism has that covered lol

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-08-2009, 07:06 AM
My whacky theory is that you could possible modify human DNA to make humans grow 40 foot tall.

You sound more or less Metal Gear's Gnome project.
Where the people try to make Ultimate soldiers by using
the big boss's DNA, am I wrong.

axel1
07-08-2009, 10:42 AM
You sound more or less Metal Gear's Gnome project.
Where the people try to make Ultimate soldiers by using
the big boss's DNA, am I wrong.

That's not where I got the idea, but something like that. The same idea has been used in many movies/games (e.g Deus Ex, Resident Evil, Universal Soldier) but they are all basically about creating the perfect killer. All involving some spin-off eugenics program involving direct fiddling with DNA. My idea is to actually benefit humanity :p

The Ultimate N00b
07-09-2009, 01:00 AM
My wacky theory is that this is a stupid thread. And your all stupid. :P jk.

axel1
07-09-2009, 04:18 AM
My wacky theory is that this is a stupid thread. And your all stupid. :P jk.

"Your" is a possessive adjective, you meant to write "you're" which is a contraction of "you are", a common mistake stupid people make... Jk :p

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-09-2009, 04:30 AM
"Your" is a possessive adjective, you meant to write "you're" which is a contraction of "you are", a common mistake stupid people make... Jk :p

Not everyone speaks perfect english, you must've known that by now.
But a native make a mistake such as this then you are right.

axel1
07-09-2009, 06:12 AM
Not everyone speaks perfect english, you must've known that by now.
But a native make a mistake such as this then you are right.

Oh of course, I was just jokingly pointing out the irony in him calling everyone stupid yet making one of the most detested spelling mistakes on the internet... especially by elites who think they are intellectually superior to everybody :p

Aravisian
07-11-2009, 09:16 AM
Oh of course, I was just jokingly pointing out the irony in him calling everyone stupid yet making one of the most detested spelling mistakes on the internet... especially by elites who think they are intellectually superior to everybody :p

My list also includes "loose" being typed when the writer intended to say "lose."

It's so extremely common and in spite of how utterly annoying it is when people correct spelling, punctuation and grammar, I cannot help but correct that one considering that I see it a hundred times a day (Exaggeration.)

axel1
07-11-2009, 11:44 AM
My list also includes "loose" being typed when the writer intended to say "lose."

It's so extremely common and in spite of how utterly annoying it is when people correct spelling, punctuation and grammar, I cannot help but correct that one considering that I see it a hundred times a day (Exaggeration.)

Lol I see that often. My pet peeve is pretty weird, it's when people write "earth" without a capital. Why? because it's a mistake even professional publications make, including my favorite games (Resident Evil).

But probably the most common mistake is using a small "i" without capitalizing it. That's one I usually go all German over, not because it annoys me, but because the poster can always seem that bit more intelligent if (s)he changes that habit :p

GameGeeks
07-11-2009, 11:46 AM
My wacky theory today is that I'm a duck.

Aravisian
07-11-2009, 11:49 AM
My wacky theory today is that I'm a duck.

Let's conduct some experiments to see if this is true.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g

GameGeeks
07-11-2009, 11:51 AM
Too bad they where only active for four years outside of movies.

Aravisian
07-11-2009, 12:00 PM
Too bad they where only active for four years outside of movies.

Quality, not quantity?;)

GameGeeks
07-11-2009, 12:00 PM
True, still sucks though.

deadly_-_dreamerX
07-11-2009, 12:17 PM
Quality, not quantity?;)

I think having 1 strategist with 1,000 men force is much better
then having a man blinded by ambitions leading an army of 100,000.:nono:

GameGeeks
07-11-2009, 12:22 PM
Sheer numbers would win that fight.

axel1
07-11-2009, 12:41 PM
Let's conduct some experiments to see if this is true.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g

"Build a bridge outta her"

Man that's a classic, I feel like a Monty Python marathon about now...

I think having 1 strategist with 1,000 men force is much better
then having a man blinded by ambitions leading an army of 100,000.:nono:

Yep, just look at the war between Soviets and Finland, Israel and Pan-Arabia, or just look at anything Hitler did during his war on the Soviet Union.

Now look at Sparta. Jks.

khoazy
09-09-2009, 05:23 PM
girls are ****ing crazy..oh wait thats not whacky just facts..

Mallen
09-26-2009, 01:11 PM
One theory put forward by my old employer is that flies are evidence of inter-dimentional travel as one day they're there and then the next they're nowhere to be found.

vido93
10-01-2009, 02:27 PM
that would be because they fly away. to a new location. and as always, more shall come. and leave once again.

Ant-ReX
11-06-2009, 06:52 AM
Well my hypothesis, we need to make a wrom-hole in the space for quicker travelling.
For example we have point A and B. It will take to reach from A to B 5 sec.
But with that dimensional rift we can cut down the Time. So It will take less time from now on 0.05 sec to A and B.

A----------------B
--->5 Sec

-------Same distance travlled in less tiime.
A----(---------)--B
---> 0.05 sec

() <-- the wormhole.

Shuji
11-13-2009, 07:58 PM
basically my theory is that something (like space) can become so infinite that it can and will eventually become finite:confused:. (Just me making no sense whatsoever...........again):shocked:

Tecseiryu, Hacker for You
11-17-2009, 03:13 PM
Ok, heres my theory.

It's serious stuff. Might rock your world.


I'm going to assume most of you have a high-school degree and understand basic physics/chemistry.

We all know that the atom is made of a nucleos (proton+neutron) and electrons running around it. What's in between those massive spaces (relatively speaking)? NOTHING.

Now picture that all over your body. You are basically material made from nothing from empty space, with the ocasional proton and electron (once again, relatively speaking).

Place you're hand against the table. You can't burst through it can you. It's to hard. It is cedited to the repulsion of the electrons in your hand and the electrons in the table.

Here's where my theory comes in: If you hit it hard enough to break the table, are you changing the concentration of electrons in your hand? Is this proof that the soul exists and that you are essentially moving "charges" at free will? Maybe this prooves the existance of chi. (Not a-lá DragonBall Z hehe)

Well that's my theory let me know what you think.

*WoW*

Pretty Impressive Food for Thought.

deadly_-_dreamerX
11-21-2009, 12:29 AM
basically my theory is that something (like space) can become so infinite that it can and will eventually become finite:confused:. (Just me making no sense whatsoever...........again):shocked:

Unfortunately the is space expanding as we speek, it will continue to grow to the point of infinty it, as it was nothing but space.



I am aslo thinking about this too,

Quark-proton-nuclie-element-molecule-matter-object-celestal object-????

Mistress Doomhammer
02-19-2010, 03:00 PM
My thoery is that Schrödinger's cat is actually a dog.

ShadyBrent
02-19-2010, 03:26 PM
Ya cant open the box so we'll never know !

DrGrease
02-20-2010, 06:18 PM
its all about microcosms. trust me. let me know if y'all want(or need), an explanation.

Mistress Doomhammer
02-20-2010, 06:57 PM
its all about microcosms. trust me. let me know if y'all want(or need), an explanation.

Sure ^.^ I'd love an explaination.

DrGrease
02-22-2010, 04:34 PM
Sure ^.^ I'd love an explaination.

look at the structure of something small and watch how crazy things get. example:take an atom. protons electrons and nuetrons spinning in "orbit" around the nucleus right? well everything on our planet is made of these which is turn one of several planets spinning in orbit around a nucleus of its own. our sun. just like our galaxy the milky way is a huge spiral of stars spiining around a center mass of more dense stars. there are other things as well. like how the same amount of ocean covering the earth is roughly the same amount of water in our bodies. as well as our blood having the same amount of salt as the sea.

robinkeley
02-27-2010, 02:26 AM
i like study in science but due to financial problems my dream not come and i leave the science but if i get a chance to show my performance so i will show it .i know very well science .

Mistress Doomhammer
02-27-2010, 09:54 AM
i like study in science but due to financial problems my dream not come and i leave the science but if i get a chance to show my performance so i will show it .i know very well science .

there is no part of that mish mash of words that wasn't awesome, but not as awesome as me, because I rock! FEAR MY GREATNESS AND BEAUTY!

DrGrease
02-28-2010, 09:52 PM
/\ you spelled sentence wrong.:)

Mistress Doomhammer
03-02-2010, 12:46 PM
/\ you spelled sentence wrong.:)

; ; cut a girl a break, I had been drinking that day. :( fixed btw

DrGrease
03-04-2010, 11:52 AM
; ; cut a girl a break, I had been drinking that day. :( fixed btw

aww.i was just playing. old lady was reading over my shoulder and i was drinking and she was like, "she spelled it wrong!", and i was like, "chill out." but i didn't know what else to post. did you like my crazy theory or what?:confused:

Mistress Doomhammer
03-04-2010, 05:46 PM
It fits with my "the universe is but the small particle of a Goddesss who is on a world that is itself part of an particle of an even larger Goddess theory" I call it the Matrioshka Theory.

That and I also believe the univserse is just an extension of my body and everyone else is just a psychotic delusion.

DrGrease
03-05-2010, 01:07 PM
you should read "breakfast of champions".:)

Mistress Doomhammer
03-05-2010, 01:47 PM
you should read "breakfast of champions".:)

Is it about how awesome I am? ^.^

Jewhonks
04-04-2010, 01:24 PM
Here's my theory, you have to keep an open mind to get it.
H20 = 420

*kepp in mind 4 can be written two different ways*
so cover the bottom left of the letter H with your thumb or what else, and you get 420. It's stoner logics. well used to be for me anyways when I was a big pothead. It's still funny though.:D

Pizza1295
04-08-2010, 06:22 PM
I had a crazy theory today. you guys know how when you pass by certain things, like sewage areas and such, you feel like it smells like rotten eggs? even if you havn't ever smelled rotten eggs? my theory is when we are born there are some smells that we know by instinct and never have to learn

Goveynetcom
04-08-2010, 06:23 PM
I had a crazy theory today. you guys know how when you pass by certain things, like sewage areas and such, you feel like it smells like rotten eggs? even if you havn't ever smelled rotten eggs? my theory is when we are born there are some smells that we know by instinct and never have to learn
Possibly true, so I'll agree :).

rgarrett87
04-09-2010, 03:11 AM
More of an interesting point of view.

WARNING: CONTAINS A VIEW THAT HAS CAUSED 9 OF MY FRIENDS TO QUESTION THEIR FAITH...That is all...

Most of us already know or have heard the story of Job (JOBE). If you haven't, brief version.

Job had many "blessings". A successful farm, this farm brought wealth. On top of that, he had a loving family and great health. He followed God, and accredited his "blessings" to Him.

Now, Lucifer witnessing this, approaches God, convinces Him that Job would stray if it weren't for his "blessings". A "wager" is placed. God strips Job of his farm with draught, and now no longer wealthy. His family dies and Job gets leperacy...

Well, Job doesn't stray, and is rewarded 10 fold. Awesome -_-

But what ACTUALLY happened here?
A show of true faith? Yes.
A man shown mercy? Kinda I guess, at the end...
Lucifer fooling God?! (I KNOW! YOU'RE SHOCKED!)

YES

What is Lucifer's supposed goal? To ruin God and his flock. To suffer mankind. Well, goal accomplished. And through God Himself!

Deathmagnet4
05-23-2010, 10:59 AM
The unlucky theory. This theory consist of bad luck belived to be Superstition
buts its real. Let same 50% chance and winning and you lose 6 times in a row
thats because of hypnotoad if theres 99% chance you win and you lose well thats just plain bad luck no theory there. The theory is thALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD.

jbluedue
06-23-2010, 11:33 PM
heres my theory, its about black holes:

well, we all know if u were to go in a black hole, you'd never come out right? some ppl think you die but my theory is that blackholes are really one way doors. like if any of u play roblox, the one way noob trapdoor, you walk in, cant walk back out. basically, like if a ship full of astronauts accidently got sucked into a black hole, we assume they are dead, but maybe they were transported to a parallel universe, the other blackhole on the other side being the opposite of our side, you leave it, but it repels out with more force than an incoming object so you can never go back in. and that that universe also has black holes that suck up, and blow out on our end, but maybe the blow out black holes are farther out, maybe they end drifting and maybe drift to our planet or others, which could mean death on impact, or somehow are covered in rock (whatever species they are) and since their ship is covered in rock, we assume meteor but the speed and thermosphere could burn up the rockand ship at same time, or at least if part of the rock breaks off, the ship would burn up inside the rock or turn into magma, which when it lands, before anyone touches it, it couldcool and be rock in and out. and that could explain where aliens come from, accidental blackhole travel. if we could go out into space safely and very far, could we map out black holes, at least the ones presently here, and be able to teleport to other universes, even parallel ones, u know, like ours but backwards. remember im 14 and have always wondered things liek this, cause space is huge, why? is there a very advanced planet lightyears away that can travel to others? and how is it never ending? nothing can never end, i have another theory but ill wait to post it lol i type to much >.<

pecuequita
06-30-2010, 07:51 AM
neer heard of such game

Mallen
07-02-2010, 04:35 AM
My theory is tha for every story told another universe is created in which that story takes place but when someone remakes that story the old universe is then distraught with disaster. So in following this theory that could mean that our universe could have been the result of a story been told in another universe but has been remade so many times that disasters just keep happining here.

kevin711
07-09-2010, 02:20 PM
i really hope we dont have to believe these theories because i have a lot of %^&*() up stuff i gotta say, now my theory is bout swine flew, i personaly believe swine flew is a conspiricy set up by the governmeant to strike fear into the american people, i think that governmeant officials break into ur house at night and inject u with the swine flew virus so then obviously u catch it then when the doctor says ur going to die, u donate everythin u own to the governmeant then when u live u have nothin to ur name and the governmeant has more useless crap which they can sell and get money which they can blow on drugs then need more money cuz there addicted so they borrow money from china

monkey5413
07-14-2010, 11:35 AM
Ok. Assuming you can go back in time and stop yourself from being born you would create a never ending paradox unless another time traveller intervenes
. If you go back and stop yourself from being born then you cant go back because you dont exist. If you dont go back then you exist, and the paradox restarts.:devil:

Crash_
07-14-2010, 12:33 PM
here's my theory, if you kill someone you go to jail :eek:, Ingenious isnt it :O

kevin711
07-17-2010, 01:58 PM
here's my theory, if you kill someone you go to jail :eek:, Ingenious isnt it :O

that really depends on who u r, *cough o.j. cough*

and another theory, earth quakes...there all set up by the governmeant to terrify people into investing on insurance makin them richer allowing them to invest more on there mind control waves that make us believe anything they say...

RRAAGGEE
09-24-2010, 02:12 PM
some of these seem weird.

I think the iraq war isnt about terrorists, and that afganistan DOES have WMD's hidden somewhere.

Winston
09-24-2010, 03:11 PM
Exactly, Kameo; how many times does it take to rip a sheet of paper in half repeatedly until it is inexistent? Since atoms cannot be created or destroyed, may as well be infinite. It's like trying to divide a positive nonzero number by 2 repeatedly until you get 0; you'll never get there.I learned that in Third Grade, too...and math is probably the only thing I paid attention to when I was that young, as every other subject depressed me. Instead of saying 10 / 3 = 3.3..., you say 3 r1. Basically, the remainder method is used to change it into a fraction later, 3 and r/3; r = 1.

Also, x/0 should not equal 0, for two reasons:
Graph the linear equation y = 0x in a coordinate plane. It's pretty much just a horizontal line, and if you know what something called slope is, essentially "rise over run," you know that a horizontal line has a slope of 0 (m = 0) and a vertical line has a slope of what I believe to be infinite (m = x/0; x > 0).
x/y can be written as a fraction. 3/5 could be written as either 0.6 or the fraction itself. But x/0? Say x is 1. Are you sure 1 out of 0 pieces of something is still considered 0 in amount and quantity?

Yes... put any quantity of zero and its zero. In respect to your pieces example. If there is zero to take from then there is zero. If a puzzle was 0 pieces - as silly as it may be - if you take one piece from it, otherwise 1 from 0 then you would be left with... 0 pieces as there is nothing to take from it.

ThatBabyJOne
10-25-2010, 05:53 PM
So here is my crazy theory. Well, it's not really crazy but ok. Lots of posts have been about government this, government that. RISE UP AND FIGHT BACK. Yes the government was behind 911. Yes the government is behind AIDS/HIV/Cancer cures (they exist but it would kill the pharmaceutical department too much to release them). Yes the government created a war out of nothing. ****ing squash them out! That's my theory. We squash them out and fix everything. Ha? Good yes?

skr3ach
10-25-2010, 07:15 PM
That the government has mental satellites that tracks people, as well as listens in on some of there most private discussion. Selling them to the world.

fcf813
10-26-2010, 12:22 AM
Ok. Assuming you can go back in time and stop yourself from being born you would create a never ending paradox unless another time traveller intervenes
. If you go back and stop yourself from being born then you cant go back because you dont exist. If you dont go back then you exist, and the paradox restarts.:devil:
A time traveler could go back and stop his or her own birth. The act of stopping one's own birth would create an alternate time-line. There is an infinity of alternate time-lines (dimensions). Time is not a static or liner (its a circle from our perspective) phenomenon. Time is alterable, both in past and future. There is no "now", as the current moment is ever moving forward on the path of time. Time being infinite means that it can be broken-down into an infinite number of moments, therefore "now" is a relative concept. String Theory points to all this.
http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-forum/weird.gif (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)

Deliphin11
12-29-2010, 03:26 PM
Scientists say the reason we can't go back in time is because of feedback destroying the wormhole, but I have a much more reasonable theory why, actually two, the more reasonable one i forgot sadly, here's the other one: Time is non existent, The universe does not record what happens. We don't actually go forward in time, our atoms just move slower. Time not existing means we cannot go back, because there's no record of the location of every atom in the universe, and even if there was, we couldn't rearrange them all instantaneously. So even if the worm hole doesn't break itself, we still can't go back in time, or even at least choose the time.

gordon
01-31-2011, 05:39 PM
Idea:
Parallel universes are created constantly and in infinite quantity. An elementary particle may move in any direction it likes forwards, backwards, left, or right. An electron may stop orbiting and move towards the nucleus and crash into it, an apple may rise into the air escaping my mouth, or a bike rider may suddenly fall over while moving.

Though these instances would disrupt the rules of nature that allow us to exist, and the universe would breakdown and destroy. The one universes that doesn't choose to disrupt the rules of nature in its movement choice will be allowed to continue and is therefore permitted the movement of another set particles and whichever set of movements doesn't violate the laws of nature will still exist at the end of that time frame.

Perhaps then the explanation of our laws of nature is simply that it allows for the framework we know as our world to exist. Any instance under which they aren't obeyed would create a contradiction, leading to the disruption of the universes previously organized system essentially "destroying" itself. Leading to only a minute set of possible outcomes being able to occur without contradiction to all that came before it. Can we see the idea of there being variations of the possible outcomes in quantum mechanics? Under which a particles trajectory is unknown and has only the probability of undertaking a certain path.

I only propose this. Not sure if I believe it but seemed it might be possible.

Can we further have other universes that exist under this random selection process with other fundamental laws? Do I feel sorry for myself if I think of the pain I would have to endure as I suddenly start to pass through my chair only to find that the laws of nature are suddenly obeyed again and half my ass is stuck in the chair? Luckily I probably wouldn't feel the pain as the universe would probably be in such a degenerative state prior to such a large violation of natural laws, but...

Anyways let me know if it makes sense or not.

Sigilstone17
01-31-2011, 09:10 PM
Here's a crazy idea:

There are no parallel universes
There is no "higher power"
There is no way to travel through time
Everything is exactly how we perceive it, nothing more.

Now tell me what you think of that?

Klendathu
01-31-2011, 09:18 PM
Here's a crazy idea:

There are no parallel universes
There is no "higher power"
There is no way to travel through time
Everything is exactly how we perceive it, nothing more.


Now tell me what you think of that?

There may or may not be parallel universes
There is no "higher power"
You can only travel forward through time
You can not see what I see because you see what you see. You can not know what I know because you know what you know. What I see and what I know can not be added to what you see and what you know because they are not of the same kind. Neither can it replace what you see and what you know because that would be to replace you yourself.

Pizza1295
02-01-2011, 04:56 PM
oh man I shouldn't look in this thread...all the paradoxes, it's because of these damn paradoxes that so many question so many things

Ss4gogeta0
02-03-2011, 04:41 PM
Heres one... Orochi is God over all

Klendathu
02-03-2011, 05:55 PM
Anything that happens, happens. Anything that in happening causes something else to happen, causes something else to happen.
Anything that in happening causes itself to happen again, happens again.
It does not necessarily do it on chronological order though.

Pizza1295
02-03-2011, 07:07 PM
Anything that happens, happens. Anything that in happening causes something else to happen, causes something else to happen.
Anything that in happening causes itself to happen again, happens again.
It does not necessarily do it on chronological order though.

yeah, that's what I say when weening myself off the headache-inducing subject :sleep:

MikeB214
03-02-2011, 01:41 PM
I believe that the 'Science/Technology' forums should have, "Want to argue with people that don't believe in what you believe? Post here!"

Maybe this should go in the suggestions forums. :shrug:

Prince Doopliss
03-04-2011, 07:02 PM
Without sane people there will not be crazy people. There Cannot be sane without insane. The world will not hold a world of just crazies or sane people. People with sanitty has a little craziness. People that our insane might have a little sannity. The world isn't complete without those things.

xX9XCXx
05-22-2011, 11:44 PM
i am engineering a new air purification system that is to be placed in military installations and uses electrical currents at high speed and heat to fry everything to a crisp!

Jjzme2
05-23-2011, 02:02 AM
I was thinking last night of like a 9mm bullet that explodes several seconds after leaving the chamber of a gun. Kind of like a Pistol/RPG hybrid.